Python programming provides us with a built-in @property
decorator which makes usage of getters and setters much easier in Object-Oriented Programming.
Before going into details on what @property
decorator is, let us first build an intuition on why it would be needed in the first place.
Class Without Getters and Setters
Let us assume that we decide to make a class that stores the temperature in degrees Celsius. And, it would also implement a method to convert the temperature into degrees Fahrenheit.
One way of doing this is as follows:
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature = 0):
self.temperature = temperature
def to_fahrenheit(self):
return (self.temperature * 1.8) + 32
We can make objects out of this class and manipulate the temperature
attribute as we wish:
# Basic method of setting and getting attributes in Python
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature=0):
self.temperature = temperature
def to_fahrenheit(self):
return (self.temperature * 1.8) + 32
# Create a new object
human = Celsius()
# Set the temperature
human.temperature = 37
# Get the temperature attribute
print(human.temperature)
# Get the to_fahrenheit method
print(human.to_fahrenheit())
Output
37 98.60000000000001
Here, the extra decimal places when converting into Fahrenheit is due to the Floating Point Arithmetic Error.
So, whenever we assign or retrieve any object attribute like temperature
as shown above, Python searches it in the object's built-in __dict__
dictionary attribute as
print(human.__dict__)
# Output: {'temperature': 37}
Therefore, human.temperature
internally becomes human.__dict__['temperature']
.
Using Getters and Setters
Suppose we want to extend the usability of the Celsius class defined above. We know that the temperature of any object cannot reach below -273.15 degrees Celsius.
Let's update our code to implement this value constraint.
An obvious solution to the above restriction will be to hide the attribute temperature
(make it private) and define new getter and setter methods to manipulate it.
This can be done as follows:
# Making Getters and Setter methods
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature=0):
self.set_temperature(temperature)
def to_fahrenheit(self):
return (self.get_temperature() * 1.8) + 32
# getter method
def get_temperature(self):
return self._temperature
# setter method
def set_temperature(self, value):
if value < -273.15:
raise ValueError("Temperature below -273.15 is not possible.")
self._temperature = value
As we can see, the above method introduces two new get_temperature()
and set_temperature()
methods.
Furthermore, temperature
was replaced with _temperature
. An underscore _
at the beginning is used to denote private variables in Python.
Now, let's use this implementation:
# Making Getters and Setter methods
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature=0):
self.set_temperature(temperature)
def to_fahrenheit(self):
return (self.get_temperature() * 1.8) + 32
# getter method
def get_temperature(self):
return self._temperature
# setter method
def set_temperature(self, value):
if value < -273.15:
raise ValueError("Temperature below -273.15 is not possible.")
self._temperature = value
# Create a new object, set_temperature() internally called by __init__
human = Celsius(37)
# Get the temperature attribute via a getter
print(human.get_temperature())
# Get the to_fahrenheit method, get_temperature() called by the method itself
print(human.to_fahrenheit())
# new constraint implementation
human.set_temperature(-300)
# Get the to_fahreheit method
print(human.to_fahrenheit())
Output
37 98.60000000000001 Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 30, in <module> File "<string>", line 16, in set_temperature ValueError: Temperature below -273.15 is not possible.
This update successfully implemented the new restriction. We are no longer allowed to set the temperature below -273.15 degrees Celsius.
Note: The private variables don't actually exist in Python. There are simply norms to be followed. The language itself doesn't apply any restrictions.
However, the bigger problem with the above update is that all the programs that implemented our previous class have to modify their code from obj.temperature
to obj.get_temperature()
and all expressions like obj.temperature = val
to obj.set_temperature(val)
.
This refactoring can cause problems while dealing with hundreds of thousands of lines of codes.
All in all, our new update was not backwards compatible. This is where @property
comes to rescue.
The property Class
A pythonic way to deal with the above problem is to use the property
class. Here is how we can update our code:
# using property class
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature=0):
self.temperature = temperature
def to_fahrenheit(self):
return (self.temperature * 1.8) + 32
# getter
def get_temperature(self):
print("Getting value...")
return self._temperature
# setter
def set_temperature(self, value):
print("Setting value...")
if value < -273.15:
raise ValueError("Temperature below -273.15 is not possible")
self._temperature = value
# creating a property object
temperature = property(get_temperature, set_temperature)
We added the print() function inside get_temperature()
and set_temperature()
to clearly observe that they are being executed.
The last line of the code makes a property object temperature
. Simply put, property attaches some code (get_temperature
and set_temperature
) to the member attribute accesses (temperature
).
Let's use this update code:
# using property class
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature=0):
self.temperature = temperature
def to_fahrenheit(self):
return (self.temperature * 1.8) + 32
# getter
def get_temperature(self):
print("Getting value...")
return self._temperature
# setter
def set_temperature(self, value):
print("Setting value...")
if value < -273.15:
raise ValueError("Temperature below -273.15 is not possible")
self._temperature = value
# creating a property object
temperature = property(get_temperature, set_temperature)
human = Celsius(37)
print(human.temperature)
print(human.to_fahrenheit())
human.temperature = -300
Output
Setting value... Getting value... 37 Getting value... 98.60000000000001 Setting value... Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 31, in <module> File "<string>", line 18, in set_temperature ValueError: Temperature below -273 is not possible
As we can see, any code that retrieves the value of temperature
will automatically call get_temperature()
instead of a dictionary (__dict__) look-up.
Similarly, any code that assigns a value to temperature
will automatically call set_temperature()
.
We can even see above that set_temperature()
was called even when we created an object.
human = Celsius(37) # prints Setting value...
Can you guess why?
The reason is that when an object is created, the __init__()
method gets called. This method has the line self.temperature = temperature
. This expression automatically calls set_temperature()
.
Similarly, any access like c.temperature
automatically calls get_temperature()
. This is what property does.
By using property
, we can see that no modification is required in the implementation of the value constraint. Thus, our implementation is backward compatible.
Note: The actual temperature value is stored in the private _temperature
variable. The temperature
attribute is a property object which provides an interface to this private variable.
The @property Decorator
In Python, property() is a built-in function that creates and returns a property
object. The syntax of this function is:
property(fget=None, fset=None, fdel=None, doc=None)
Here,
fget
is function to get value of the attributefset
is function to set value of the attributefdel
is function to delete the attributedoc
is a string (like a comment)
As seen from the implementation, these function arguments are optional.
A property object has three methods, getter()
, setter()
, and deleter()
to specify fget
, fset
and fdel
at a later point. This means, the line:
temperature = property(get_temperature,set_temperature)
can be broken down as:
# make empty property
temperature = property()
# assign fget
temperature = temperature.getter(get_temperature)
# assign fset
temperature = temperature.setter(set_temperature)
These two pieces of code are equivalent.
Programmers familiar with Python Decorators can recognize that the above construct can be implemented as decorators.
We can even not define the names get_temperature
and set_temperature
as they are unnecessary and pollute the class namespace.
For this, we reuse the temperature
name while defining our getter and setter functions. Let's look at how to implement this as a decorator:
class Celsius:
def __init__(self, temperature=0):
# when creating the object, the setter method is called automatically
self.temperature = temperature
def to_fahrenheit(self):
# convert the temperature to Fahrenheit
return (self.temperature * 1.8) + 32
@property
def temperature(self):
print("Getting value...")
return self._temperature
@temperature.setter
def temperature(self, value):
print("Setting value...")
# ensure the temperature does not go below absolute zero
if value < -273.15:
raise ValueError("Temperature below -273.15°C is not possible")
self._temperature = value
# create an object with a valid temperature
human = Celsius(37)
# print the temperature in Celsius
print(human.temperature)
# print the temperature in Fahrenheit
print(human.to_fahrenheit())
# attempting to create an object with a temperature below -273.15°C will raise an exception
try:
coldest_thing = Celsius(-300)
except ValueError as e:
print(e)
Output
Setting value... Getting value... 37 Getting value... 98.60000000000001 Setting value... ValueError: Temperature below -273 is not possible
The above implementation is simple and efficient. It is the recommended way to use property
.